Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Board of Trustees, Boston University
Correction: Anteriorite des Civilisations Negres: Myth ou Verite Historique?Source: African Historical Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2 (1968), p. 210Published by: Boston University African Studies CenterStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/216395 .
Accessed: 08/05/2014 23:46
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Boston University African Studies Center and Board of Trustees, Boston University are collaborating withJSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to African Historical Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 169.229.32.137 on Thu, 8 May 2014 23:46:07 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
CORRECTIONS, VOLUME I, NUMBER 1 CORRECTIONS, VOLUME I, NUMBER 1 CORRECTIONS, VOLUME I, NUMBER 1
Philip E. L. Smith, "Problems and Possibilities of the Prehistoric Rock Art of Northern Africa"
We regret that a number of corrections and changes which the author had made in the revised version of the manuscript were, through an unfortunate error during editing, not incorporated in the published text. Among the cor- rections which should have been made are the following:
page line 2 5 delete Anti- 8 37 read: on prehistoric research in . . .
10 7 read: alleged introduction 10 14 read: New Kingdom 12 6 read: discovery 31 25 read: but Australian art . . . 32 22 read: food-producing
In addition, a highly important footnote added by the author was omitted in the published article. It may be inserted on p. 34, line 27 as note 114a: "Mori also mentions a radiocarbon date of 6122 B.C. + 100 which seems to belong to the end of the Round-Head polychrome painting style. See Tadrart Acacus. Arte rupestre e culture nel Sahara preistorico (Torino, G. Einaudi, 1965), p. 241."
Douglas L. Wheeler,"Nineteenth-Century African Protest in Angola: Prince Nicolas of Kongo (1830?-1860)"
Page 40, line 8 and throughout the article, "Agua Rosada de Sardonia" should read "Agua Rosada e Sardonia."
Page 41, lines 27 and 28 should read "The Kongo Kingdom was directly behind the coastal area of this coveted trade, by 1845 dominated by British and American merchants."
Page 42, line 24, read "(1834-1853)" for "(1843-1853)."
Page 43, line 28, read "Rose Water and Sardonia" for "Rose Water of Sardonia."
Page 55, footnote 69 in text should have the citation for footnote 71, footnote 70 the citation for footnote 69, footnote 71 the citation for footnote 70.
Book Reviews
Page 134, last 2 lines in paragraph 2 should read "be regretted is that writers like Diop or Rogers could not take the lead in the reassessment."
Philip E. L. Smith, "Problems and Possibilities of the Prehistoric Rock Art of Northern Africa"
We regret that a number of corrections and changes which the author had made in the revised version of the manuscript were, through an unfortunate error during editing, not incorporated in the published text. Among the cor- rections which should have been made are the following:
page line 2 5 delete Anti- 8 37 read: on prehistoric research in . . .
10 7 read: alleged introduction 10 14 read: New Kingdom 12 6 read: discovery 31 25 read: but Australian art . . . 32 22 read: food-producing
In addition, a highly important footnote added by the author was omitted in the published article. It may be inserted on p. 34, line 27 as note 114a: "Mori also mentions a radiocarbon date of 6122 B.C. + 100 which seems to belong to the end of the Round-Head polychrome painting style. See Tadrart Acacus. Arte rupestre e culture nel Sahara preistorico (Torino, G. Einaudi, 1965), p. 241."
Douglas L. Wheeler,"Nineteenth-Century African Protest in Angola: Prince Nicolas of Kongo (1830?-1860)"
Page 40, line 8 and throughout the article, "Agua Rosada de Sardonia" should read "Agua Rosada e Sardonia."
Page 41, lines 27 and 28 should read "The Kongo Kingdom was directly behind the coastal area of this coveted trade, by 1845 dominated by British and American merchants."
Page 42, line 24, read "(1834-1853)" for "(1843-1853)."
Page 43, line 28, read "Rose Water and Sardonia" for "Rose Water of Sardonia."
Page 55, footnote 69 in text should have the citation for footnote 71, footnote 70 the citation for footnote 69, footnote 71 the citation for footnote 70.
Book Reviews
Page 134, last 2 lines in paragraph 2 should read "be regretted is that writers like Diop or Rogers could not take the lead in the reassessment."
Philip E. L. Smith, "Problems and Possibilities of the Prehistoric Rock Art of Northern Africa"
We regret that a number of corrections and changes which the author had made in the revised version of the manuscript were, through an unfortunate error during editing, not incorporated in the published text. Among the cor- rections which should have been made are the following:
page line 2 5 delete Anti- 8 37 read: on prehistoric research in . . .
10 7 read: alleged introduction 10 14 read: New Kingdom 12 6 read: discovery 31 25 read: but Australian art . . . 32 22 read: food-producing
In addition, a highly important footnote added by the author was omitted in the published article. It may be inserted on p. 34, line 27 as note 114a: "Mori also mentions a radiocarbon date of 6122 B.C. + 100 which seems to belong to the end of the Round-Head polychrome painting style. See Tadrart Acacus. Arte rupestre e culture nel Sahara preistorico (Torino, G. Einaudi, 1965), p. 241."
Douglas L. Wheeler,"Nineteenth-Century African Protest in Angola: Prince Nicolas of Kongo (1830?-1860)"
Page 40, line 8 and throughout the article, "Agua Rosada de Sardonia" should read "Agua Rosada e Sardonia."
Page 41, lines 27 and 28 should read "The Kongo Kingdom was directly behind the coastal area of this coveted trade, by 1845 dominated by British and American merchants."
Page 42, line 24, read "(1834-1853)" for "(1843-1853)."
Page 43, line 28, read "Rose Water and Sardonia" for "Rose Water of Sardonia."
Page 55, footnote 69 in text should have the citation for footnote 71, footnote 70 the citation for footnote 69, footnote 71 the citation for footnote 70.
Book Reviews
Page 134, last 2 lines in paragraph 2 should read "be regretted is that writers like Diop or Rogers could not take the lead in the reassessment."
210 210 210
This content downloaded from 169.229.32.137 on Thu, 8 May 2014 23:46:07 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
