Upload
m
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S!'p thetic llletals. 2 7 (1988) B439- B444 B43g
NEW CONDUCTING PARANITROPHENYLMALONONITRILE COMPLEXES WITH TTF AND TMTSF
K.D. TRUONG, A.D. BANDRAUK, J. ZAUHAR, M. AUBIN
Groupe de Recherche sur les Semiconducteurs et les Difilectriques, D@partements
de ehimie et de physiques, Facult~ des sciences, Universit@ de Sherbrooke,
Sherbrooke, QuEbec (Canada) JIK 2RI
ABSTRACT
The complexes of Paranitrophenylmalononitri]e (PNPMA) with TTF and TMTSF have
been synthesized. The electrical resistivity, thermoelectric power (TEP) and
ESR properties are studied and discussed. Both compounds are semiconductors
with the TTF ordered and the TMTSF disordered.
INTRODUCTION AND SYNTHESIS
The discovery of a superconducting ground state in the TMTSF2X compounds has
generated extensive interest in this class of materials [1,2]. In order to stu-
dy the influence of nonsymmetric anions on the conductivity of the TMTSF and TTF
salts, we have prepared paranitrophenylmalononitrile, an organic planar acceptor
and complexed it with TTF and TMTSF. This
0~. /CN O/N ~G~CN
new acceptor is similar to TCNQ in structu-
re but is clearly nonsymmetric, with the
NO 2 group being more electronegative than
the CN groups. (TMTSF)2(PNPMA) was preps-
red by a standard electrochemical method [3] in dried and doubly distilled me-
thylene chloride. A 5 ~A DC current was applied for 2½ days which resulted in
the deposit of thin shiny metallic gray crystals on the anode of various lengths
between 3 and i0 mm.
(TTF) 2(PNPMA) was obtained by mixing hot solutions containing equimolar quan-
tities of TTF and PNPMA prepared in specially purified acetonitrile. Upon slow
cooling and partial evaporation of the solvent over 24 hours, crystals of (TTF) 2
(PNPMA) of various length up to 3 mm having a yellow to light green metallic lus-
ter were obtained. The melting point is 129-138°C. (TTF)2(PNPMA) decomposed on
recrystallisation.
0379-6779/88/$3.50 © Elsevier Sequoia/Printed in The Netherlands
B440
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Transport properties
D.C. resistivities were measured using the conventional 4 probe technique,
the current through the sample was maintained at a low level of 1 x 10 -6 A.
Temperature dependences of the resistivity are shown in Figs i and 2. Both
2.
0 (:L
(:LI.
0
O.
e TMTSF2PN PMA
a I
e"
• ..t"," l I , , , , i
.15 .20 .25 T - i /5 ( K - I / 3 )
Q
I
I n i
30
Fig. i. Normalized resistivity as a function of temperature T -I/3 for sample
TMTSF2PNPMA.
%2. cL
cL
-9°1.
TTF2PNPMA o I
I •
e • I •
i •
i o
i e
®
.15 .16 i ! i
.17 .18 .19 T-I/3 (~V3)
Fig. 2. Normalized resistivity as a function of temperature T -I/3 for sample
TTF2PNPMA.
B441
compounds show semi-conductor behaviour. The resistivity of (TTF)2(PNPMA) is
.58 ~m at 280K. It is higher than in the case of (TMTSF)2(PNPMA) in which the
resistance is about 4 x 10 -4 ~m at room temperature. This difference may be ex-
plained by the disorder of the non centrosymmetric acceptor PNPMA in the TMTSF
salt [4]. This disorder accounts for its higher conductivity than in the TTF
salt where the acceptor PNPMA is ordered [4]. The PNPMA form an alternating
lattice of donnor molecules perpendicular to the TTFs and create a potential
with periodicity 4a, corresponding to 2k F. This potential is in part responsi-
ble for the semiconducting properties by the introduction of a pseudo Peierls
gap. The TTFs are also tetramerized, which also contributes to the nonmetallic
nature of the present system. There is no overlap between the PNPMA molecules
which indicates that the counter ion does not participate in the conductivity of
these systems. Only the donor chains of the TMISF or TTF participate in the
electron transport. The separation along the TTF chains are not all the same,
we can describe the aggregation of the TTF chains as tetrameric with the distan-
ces 3.48, 3.55, 3.48, 3.67 A ° between them (Fig. 3).
The electrical results in Figs 1 and 2 give evidence of transport via variable
range hopping (VRH) at low temperature. The nearest neighbour hopping conducti-
vity is given by [5]:
, = A exp (-~a) exp (-W/kT) (i)
near room temperature where W is the energy difference between nearest neighbour
-1 , states with a distance "a" apart, c~ zs the extent of the small polaron wave
function or the decay length of a localized state.
At lower temperature, the conduction is dominated by non nearest neighbours
and one can have variable range hopping:
~' (-~/na) (-W/n3kT) ~ = E A exp exp (2)
n=l
when T is small, one can demonstrate that:
I/4 ~ = A exp -(T°/T) (3)
4(~a 4W where T O = (~-)(~)
[n two dimensions the 1/4 power dependence becomes 1/3. Our complexes follow
the T -I/3 behavior at low temperature with T o in the order of 150c~,211K for
TMTSF and TTF salts respectively.
The TEP was measured by using a dynamic methcd to avoid stray voltages, as
previously described [6], except that the present system is completely automated.
The TEP of (TTF) 2PNPMA could not be obtained below 170K because of the high re-
B442
Fig. 3.
Y TTF2PNPMA
o / ~ i
548 ' ~1/
Projection along the z axls for the sample TTF2PNPMA.
e"
• e°
e•o • ,o •
O
%.
_IO
o0
Fig. 4.
I0 T M T S F 2 P N P M A
o o o o o e ° ° °
e • e °
o e
_20 ."
, I , I I J I ,
5.2 4.0 4 .8 5.6 6 .4 T I / 3 ( K I / 3 )
Seebeck c o e f f i c i e n t as a f u n c t i o n o f T - 1 / 3 for sample TMTSF2PNPMA.
sistance of the sample. Both salts (TMTSF) 2PNPMA, (TTF) 2PNPMA (Figs 4 and 5)
follow the T I/3 dependence characteristic of VRH [7-8]:
1 k kT)i/3 d in N S = ~ ~ (kT ° " dE (4)
At 295K, they are all p type semiconductors with the value of S positive.
Below room temperature, a change in sign is observed for the TEP indicating
mixed conductivity in this temperature range. Thus the resistivity and TEP
lead to the same conclusion regarding the conductivity mechanism.
Magnetic properties
ESR experiments have been carried out for (TMTSF)2PNPMA and for (TTF)2PNPMA
as a function of temperature. A broad ESR line is obtained at room temperature
B~43
Fig. 5.
0
_100 v -
_20o :=L
v
0" )_300
TTF2PNPMA OQO 000000001e e e o e
e • ee ee
I • e •
ee e
e e I
e e ee e e e
e e e~
1 I I I I I I
5.8 6.0 6 .2
TW3( K I/3)
_400 , I
5.6 6.4. 6.6
-]/3 Seebeck coefficient as a function of T for sample TTF2PNPMA.
for the two complexes. In the TTF salt the half width of ESR line is 8G, it is
narrower than in the case of the TMTSF salt (lOOG). We found also that the g
factors of TTF salts is 2.0069 nearer to the value of a free electron than in
the case of TMTSF salt (2.0209).
Integrated intensities were obtained on fine powders of the complexes between
150K and 360K. We assume in this case an activated form for the ESR intensity
which is characteristic of linear chain spins with an antiferromagnetic alterna-
ting interaction [9-10]:
I : (C/T) exp (-j/KT) (5)
where j is the exchange energy between neighbouring spins. On the other hand
the magnetic susceptibility of a localized singlet-triplet system is given by
[hi:
c [3 + exp (2j/kT)] -I XST = } (6)
This expression also describes an activated behavior but on the localized re-
gion we have used the antiferromagnetic equation (5) to interpret our results.
We therefore obtain for (TMTSF)2PNPMA:
-i j = .027 eV = 218 cm
and for (TTF)2PNPNA:
- 1 j = .09 eV = 726 cm
B444
The observed j values can be correlated with the intermolecular electronic
interactions between the radicals. The lack of hyperfine structures suggests
that the movement of the triplet exciton is so rapid that the triplet dipolar
structure is washed out [12,13] and that the antiferromagnetic expression (5)
is more appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS
(TMTSF)2PNPMA and (TTF)2PNPMA are all p type semiconductors. The resistivity
and TEP results indicate that they are two dimensional systems and the conducti-
vity mechanism can be described by a variable range hopping model at low temperature
The magnetic properties indicate considerable delocalisation of the spins. In
both series of compounds the anions are nonsymmetric. In the TTF complexes, the
anions are ordered and clearly contribute to the semiconducting via a pseudo
Peierls mechanism. In the TMTSF complexes, the anions are considerably disor-
dered, thus resulting in a higher conductivity.
REFERENCES
i. D. J~rSme. Mol. Crys. Liq. Cryst. 79 (1982) 155.
2. R.L. Greene, P. Naen, S.Z. Huang, E.M. Engler, M.Y. Choi, P.M. Chaikin.
Mol. Crys. Liq. Cryst. 79 (1982) 183.
3. K. Bechgaard, C.S. Jacobsen, K. Mortesen, H.J. Pedersen and N. Thorup.
Solid State Commun. 33 (1980) 119.
4. A.W. Hanson (private communication).
5. D. Adler. Handbook on Semiconductors, Editor T.S. Moss, Voi. i, North 11ol-
land 1982.
6, A.A. Lakhani, S. Jandl, C. Ayache, J.P. Jay-Gerin. Phys. Rev. B28 (1983)
1978.
7. N.F. Mott and E.A. Davis. Electronic Conduction in Non Crystalline Mate-
rials, 2nd edition, Clarendon Press (Oxford) 1979.
8. M.J. Burns and P.M. Chaikin. Phys. Review B. 27 (1983) 5924.
9. J. Tanaka, M. Inoue, M. Mizuno, K. Horai. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 13 (1970)
1998.
i0. L.N. Bulaeskii. Solid State (Soviet physic) ii (1969) 921. L_
ii. J.S. Pedersen, K. Calneiro. Rep. Prog. Phys~ 50 (1987) 995.
12. D.B. Chesnut and W.D. Phillips. J. Chem. Phys. 35 (1961) 1002.
13. Z.G. Soos and H.M. McConnell. J. Chem. Phys. 43 (1965) 3780.