33
1 Nouveaux défis dans la modélisation mathématique et la simulation numérique de systèmes superfluides CIRM – Luminy – 30 June 2016 Université Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies, Lille, France Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes et Molécules Équipe Chaos Quantique Jean-Claude Garreau Symmetries and dynamics in a quantum-chaotic system 17 years of experiments on the atomic kicked rotor! Engineering Hamiltonians and symmetries

Symmetries and dynamics in a quantum-chaotic systembecasim.math.cnrs.fr/events2/meetings2/workshopCIRM/Day_04/03... · See J. Dalibard “Magnétisme artificiel pour les gaz d’atomes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Nouveaux défis dans la modélisation mathématique et la simulation numérique

de systèmes superfluides

CIRM – Luminy – 30 June 2016

Université Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies, Lille, France

Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes et Molécules

Équipe Chaos Quantique

Jean-Claude Garreau

Symmetries and dynamics in a quantum-chaotic system

17 years of experiments on the atomic kicked rotor!

Engineering Hamiltonians and symmetries

Disordered quantum systems

2

Quantum disorder

/34

Multiple scattering and interference

Strong disorder, strong localization – The Anderson model

3 /34

Perfect crystal: Delocalized Bloch waves → diffusive dynamics

Conductor

Ordered crystal

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

-20

-10

0

10

20-20

-10

0

10

20

Strong disorder, strong localization – Anderson localization

4 P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492--1505 (1958)

/34

Disordered crystal

Insulator

Localized states: Anderson (or strong) localization

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

-20

-10

0

10

20-20

-10

0

10

20

Strong localization: Complete destructive interference

(Too) many (all) interference paths contribute

Waves in disordered media

5 /34

General rule is phase averaging among different paths (no interference)

Disordered media: Return to the origin

6 /34

General rule: Still no interference

Disordered media: systems invariant under time-reversal

7 /34

Identical paths, inverted sense

Time-reversal invariant system

“Enhanced return to the origin”

Coherent backscattering

8 /34

Scattering back in the initial direction is 2 x more intense!

“Coherent backscattering”

Weak localization (weak disorder)

9 /34

G. Labeyrie et. al., Coherent backscattering of light by cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5266--5269 (1999)

F. Jendrzejewski et al., Coherent Backscattering of Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 195302 (2012)

CBS of light by cold atoms! CBS of (ultra)cold atoms by light!

• CBS and enhanced return to origin are manifestations of “weak localization”: A disordered system presents a diffusion coefficient reduced by interference effects.

• CBS was observed with kinds of wave: Light (laser light diffused by milk!), microwaves, acoustic waves, seismic waves and matter waves

Enhanced return to the origin was never directly observed with matter waves

The kicked rotor

10

The kicked rotor: A paradigm of classical and quantum chaos

/34

The kicked rotor

11 11

Free motion

J

q q

J+DJ

Kick

/34

Classical chaos: phase portraits for the classical KR

12 B. V. Chirikov, A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems, Phys. Rep. 52, 263--379 (1979)

/34

iKcked rotor: Classical and quantum dynamics

13 /34 G. Casati et al., Stochastic behavior of a quantum pendulum under periodic perturbation in Stochastic Behavior in Classical and Quantum Systems, Lect. Notes Phys. 93, 334 (1979)

Quantum behavior can be mapped to an Anderson pseudo-random model S. Fishman, D. R. Grempel and R. E. Prange, Chaos, Quantum Recurrences, and Anderson Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 509—512 (1982)

“Dynamical” localization

The kicked rotor

14

The atomic kicked rotor: An almost ideal “quantum simulator”

/34

Doing it with cold atoms

15 /34

Standing wave far from resonance (no spontaneous emission)

/34

The “unfolded” kicked rotor

16

Free motion Kick

F. L. Moore et al., Atom optics realization of the quantum d-kicked rotator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4598 (1995)

Doing it with cold atoms

17 /34

Dynamical localization, experiment with the atomic kicked rotor

18

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0

20

40

60

80

100 -100

-50

0

50

100

/34

Weak localization in the kicked rotor

19

Weak localization effects in the atomic kicked rotor

/34

Enhanced return to the origin

20 C. Hainaut et al., submitted to PRL

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

Exponential fit of the wings

/34

Hamiltonian engineering: The periodically-shifted kicked rotor

21 C. Hainaut et al., Return to the Origin as a Probe of Atomic Phase Coherence, arXiv:1606.07237 (2016)

/34

Period-2 system: Enhanced return to the origin after two kicks

Kicked rotor dynamics and symmetries

22 /34

“Universality” classes

• Orthogonal: Spinless systems invariant under time reversal

• Unitary: Spinless systems not invariant under time reversal

• Symplectic: Spin systems invariant under time reversal, and under spin rotation

The (standard) kicked rotor belongs to the orthogonal class: The kick sequence is invariant under time reversal

Breaking time-reversal symmetry

23 /34

With period-3 sequences!

How to obtain a unitary kicked rotor?

Break time-reversal symmetry

Controlled symmetry breaking

24 /34

Breaking symmetry in a controlled way

Symmetry engineering

25 C. Hainaut et al., to be published

/34

One can construct symmetry-breaking Hamiltonians

We can “engineer” more complicate ones

Period-10 Hamiltonian!

• Sequences must be periodic (condition for dynamical localization)

• But need not to be time-symmetric

e.g. combine with periodically-shifted sequences

The pertinent symmetry is PT

Symmetry engineering

26 /34

Sequence start

ERO peak

PT-invariant case

27 /34

ERO kick 16 = 6[10]

ERO kick 6

Peaks at kicks

PT symmetry breaking

28 C. Hainaut et al., to be published

/34

• No peaks at kicks : symmetry broken, unitary class

• “Mysterious” peaks appear at the period of the system

• “Mysterious” peaks increase with time for

What are these mysterious peaks?

29 /34

Coherent backscattering loops

Time-reversal:

Time-reversal symmetry:

The scattering matrix is real symmetric

These loops cannot contribute in the unitary case

What are these mysterious peaks?

30 C. Hainaut et al., to be published

/34

More complex loops

Time-reversal:

Coherent forward scattering

Coherent forward scattering

31 /34

T. Karpiuk, N. Cherroret, K. L. Lee, B. Grémaud, C. A. Müller and C. Miniatura, Coherent Forward Scattering Peak Induced by Anderson Localization Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 190601 (2012)

Numerical

Experimental

Artificial gauge fields

32 /34

Time-reversal symmetry breaking in closed systems: Magnetic fields

Interpretation in terms of artificial gauge fields? See J. Dalibard “Magnétisme artificiel pour les gaz d’atomes froids”, lectures at Collège de France (2014)

Most probably yes!

Map QKR to a 2D tight-binding (Anderson) model

Look for an effective Aharonov-Bohm flux on plaquettes

Conclusion

33

Ultracold atom physics is very powerful tool for the study of fundamental properties of quantum systems

The kicked rotor is an excellent system to study interference, decoherence, symmetries…

• Symplectic universality class

• Other symmetry-breaking strategies

R. Scharf, Kicked rotator for a spin-1/2 particle, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 22, 4223–4242 (1989)

R. Blümel and U. Smilansky, Symmetry breaking and localization in quantum chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 217–220 (1992)

• Higher-dimension Anderson model : Measurement of critical exponents

• Measurement of the function

J. Chabé et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 255702 (2008) M. Lopez et al. New J. Phys 15, 065013 (2013)

Thank you very much!